I started to mess about with the portrait and now think I have to start again. So I will.
I have realised I like two very distinct and somewhat different styles. One is what I would call the “psychological” approach where the painting is about a message of some kind. In this “psychological” group I would include Wyeth, Hopper, Hammershoi, Dorothea Tanning, Sasha Bowles and a recent discovery ,
Andrea Kowch. Andrea is described as a “symbolic” painter and she claims to paint “an alternative reality”. These works are captivating, mysterious, ask questions, challenge us and are downright riveting – to me. The use of paint is almost sparing, neat and careful. On the opposite side of the equation I love painters who appear to simply love manipulating the paint - examples are Hughie o’Donoghue, Alex Kanevsky and
Dan (and Danny) McCaw. It’s strange why I should adore both very different styles. It’s also dangerous to pigeon-hole people. Because there are psychological messages embedded in the work of the latter group and although the former group tends to use paint very “carefully” it would be blatently untrue to suggest they have no interest or technical ability in the use of paint. What all these painters have in common of course is their interest in the exploration of the human predicament through painting the human figure and maybe that is my main reason for liking them.
So I set out here today to do the first painting for absolutely ages. Didn’t know where to begin (I have a big painting planned but need to get my models into position etc.) so whenever I feel unsure it’s always a self portrait. I decided to let go and just “paint”. A satisfying experience.